Open Media Boston

metro news from the ground up

Comments

From my brief study of the issue, Gaza is probably not the most densely populated place on Earth; so I apologize for publishing this minor error of fact. On the other hand, population density was not at all the main point on offer in Mary Lynn Cramer's op-ed. Palestinian civilians are being slaughtered in large numbers by Israelis once again, and I think we should focus on that most important of all facts, and steer discussion towards what can be done to help stop the Israeli invasion on human rights grounds. Of course, if people want to argue that what Israel is doing in Gaza is correct and just, that's obviously their prerogative, too. But it's hard to hear any clear political perspective in the preceding conversation beyond notice of the need for a fact check that could have been sent directly to myself and the other editors at info@openmediaboston.org as many others have done heretofore in similar situations.

Jason Pramas
Editor/Publisher
Open Media Boston

I questioned the statement on the population density of Gaza not so much because it was important, but to point out the manner in which so many unsupported "facts" are being presented by both sides in statements about what has been happening lately in Gaza.

Supporters of Israel choose to emphasize the fact that Israel is responding to the rocket attacks on civilian areas of southern Israel, but they conveniently fail to emphasize that another goal of the Gaza operations is to end Hamas rule in Gaza. Those who take Hamas' side regularly refer to Israel "slaughtering civilians," yet no mention is made of the fact that Hamas has supported and continues to support suicide bombings of civilian targets in Israel. Personally, I don't believe there is much evidence to support the assertion that Israel is specifically targeting civilians, even though they clearly know there will be civilian casualties.

Ms. Cramer notes statements made by "Zionist government officials" about their intent to drive Gazans to near starvation, and "reduce them to howling beasts", and refers to their "genocidal agenda". Of course we have all heard hate speech from Hamas that can easily match that.

What I'm reading in the blogs and hearing from the talking heads on TV is shallow propaganda only minimally supported by actual facts.

suren's picture

Comparing the Gaza Strip to Boston, Cambridge or any other city one is comparing apples to oranges. It is a false comparison.

The reason that Encarta states that the Gaza Strip has one of the highest population densities in the world with 11,060 ppl/sq mile is that it is averaging out the urban areas (City of Gaza, Rafah, Jabaliya, etc.) with their small non-urban hinterlands. A better comparison for Gaza as whole then will be with Boston and its hinterland. What that should be is a matter of debate. If you include our urban and rural areas in Massachusetts, you are down to 820 ppl/sq. mile. But it is misleading to compare urban and rural Gaza with just urban areas here. The only correction needed for the original piece is that the writer probably meant to type "about 4,500 people per sq. kilometer."

One wonders about the motivation for the attempted "refutation" of the accurate claim about Gaza's population density. I hope that someone revises the Wikipedia piece. In its wisdom, however, the free encyclopedia anticipates just the kind of misuse of its data that we see in the "population density" comment by rwinters: "Note that figures are simply estimates of population divided by total surface area and should not be considered either as reflecting density in the urban sense or as indicative of the ability of a territory’s land to support human habitation."

Very well. If comparison of the Gaza Strip to cities like Boston, Cambridge, and New York City are false comparisons, let's look at the City of Gaza.

City of Gaza: 409,680 people in 58.3 square miles of land for a density of 7,027 people per square mile.

Like New York City and Boston and Cambridge, some parts of the City of Gaza are, no doubt, more crowded than others.

Note: Wikipedia (flawed though it may be) states that the area of the City of Gaza is 151,023 dunams (151.0 km²). This is about 58.3 square miles and I suspect this includes some less dense areas, just like the three U.S. cities. Any correction of this figure is appreciated.

Rafah is listed with a population of either 71,000 or 130,000, perhaps depending on whether you include an adjacent refugee camp. I couldn't find a figure for its land area, so I don't know its density.

Jabaliya is listed with a population of 82,877, but I also could not find a figure for its land area.

For the purpose correction and comparison:

Gaza Strip: 1,481,080 people in 139 square miles of land for a density of 10,655 people per square mile (pretty dense).

Boston, MA: 608,352 people in 48.4 square miles of land for a density of 12,569 people per square mile (more dense than Gaza).

Cambridge, MA: 101,388 people in 6.43 square miles of land for a density of 15,768 people per square mile (about 48% greater density than Gaza).

New York City: 8,274,527 people in 304.8 square miles for a density of 27,147 people per square mile (nearly 3 times the density of Gaza).

Source: Wikipedia

User login